검색 상세

퍼스널 트레이닝에 따른 운동 상해 및 참여만족도 분석

An analysis of injury causes and participants’ satisfaction based on the involvement of personal training

초록/요약

본 연구에서는 PT(persornal training) 참여자와 비참여자들의 운동실태를 종합적으로 분석하고 고객들의 참여 만족도를 파악하여 퍼스널 트레이닝의 지속적인 운동 참여를 확대시키며 한층 발전될 수 있는 계기를 제공하는데 의의를 두고자 하였다. 전산처리의 구체적인 방법으로 연구 대상자의 일반적인 특성을 살펴보기 위해 빈도분석을 하였고, 대상자들의 성별에 따른, PT 참여여부에 따른 요인 차이를 분석하기 위해 t-test를 사용하였다. 마지막으로 운동 경력, 운동 목적, 운동 방법에 따른 요인 차이를 분석하기 위해 One-way ANOVA를 이용해 분석하였으며 사후검증은 Duncan을 사용하였다. 위와 같은 방법으로 연구를 실시한 결과 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1) 성별에 따른 운동 상해요인 및 만족도 성별에 따라 상체부위에 운동 상해가 있는지를 알아보기 위해 t-test를 한 결과, 등,허리, 어깨부위에 운동 상해 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었는데, 등,허리, 어깨 모두 남자(각 M: 0.24, M: 0.23)가 여자보다 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 하체부위에서는 허벅지, 종아리부위에 운동 상해 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었는데, 허벅지, 종아리 모두 여자(각 M:0.15, M: 0.06)가 남자보다 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 성별에 따라 참여만족도에는 큰 영향이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 2) 운동 경력에 따른 운동 상해요인 및 만족도 운동 경력에 따라 상체부위에 운동 상해가 있는지를 알아보기 위해 ANOVA를 한 결과, 운동경력이 2년이상에서 어깨부위 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 하체부위에서는 운동경력이 2년이상에서 발목부위 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 운동경력에 따라 운동 참여만족도가 있는지를 알아본 결과, 사회적 만족도, 휴식적 만족도, 신체적 만족도에 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3) 운동 목적에 따른 운동 상해요인 및 만족도 운동 목적에 따라 상체부위에 운동 상해가 있는지를 알아보기 위해 ANOVA를 한 결과, 어깨, 손목 모두 근육증가(각 M:0.3100, M:0.2200)로 인해 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 하체부위에서는 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 운동 목적에 따라 운동 참여만족도가 있는지를 알아본 결과, 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 4) 운동 방법에 따른 운동 상해요인 및 만족도 첫 번째로, 운동시간에 따라 운동 상해를 알아본 결과, 1시간 30분이상에서 하퇴부위 운동 상해가 높은 것으로 분석되었고, 참여만족도는 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 두 번째로, 운동 빈도에 따라 운동 상해를 알아본 결과, 6-7일에서 하퇴부위 운동 상해가 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 참여만족도는 사회적 만족도, 휴식적 만족도, 환경적 만족도에서 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 나타났다. 세 번째로, 1 Set당 반복횟수에 따라 운동 상해를 알아본 결과, 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 없는 것으로 분석되었으며, 참여만족도는 심리적 만족도, 휴식적 만족도, 신체적 만족도에서 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 나타났다. 마지막으로, 셋트 간 휴식시간에 따라 운동 상해를 알아본 결과, 통계적으로 유의미한 결과가 없는 것으로 분석되었으며, 참여만족도에서도 유의미한 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 5) PT 참여여부에 따른 운동 상해요인 및 만족도 PT 참여여부에 따른 운동 상해 차이가 있는 지를 알아보기 위하여 t-test 를 한 결과는 전반적으로 상체부위에서는 PT 비참여자가 상해비율이 다소 높게 나타나고 있으며, 목 부위 참여(M=0.0234) 비참여(M=0.0972), 어깨부위 참여(M=0.0781) 비참여(M=0.23)에서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 하체부위에서도 마찬가지로 PT 비참여자 가 상해비율이 다소 높게 나타나고 있으며 무릎부위 참여(M=0.0703) 비참여(M=0.18)에서 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다.(P=0.016) 또한, PT 참여여부에 따른 운동 참여 만족도가 차이가 있는지를 알아보기 위하여 t-test를 한 결과 전반적으로 PT 참여여부에 따른 운동 참여만족도는 PT 참여자가 심리적, 교육적, 사회적, 휴식적, 신체적, 환경적 만족도, 6개의 모든 만족도에서 높게 나타나고 있으며 모든 만족도가 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었다.(P= 0.0000)

more

초록/요약

The purpose of this study was to contribute to the growth of continual participation in Personal Training (PT) and to provide an opportunity for further development in PT, by conducting the following research - a general analysis of the current status of people who are or are not involved in PT, and a survey on the participants? satisfaction level with exercising. Following is the information on the specific method of data processing. A frequency analysis was conducted in order to find out the general characteristics of the participants in this study. T-test was used for the analysis of causative differences, depending on the gender, or whether the participants were involved in PT or not. For the analysis of the causative differences depending on the subjects? individual experience, purpose, and method of exercising, One-way ANOVA was employed. Finally, the posteriori test was done with the assistance of Duncan. The following information was collected as a result of the research mentioned above. 1) The satisfaction level and injury causes, according to the subjects? gender: As a result of applying t-test to find out if differential injuries were made on the upper or the lower body depending on the subjects? gender, differences were found to occur on the following body parts - back, waist, and shoulders. The results indicated that male participants had more injuries than female participants on all three parts of the upper body (each, &#8499; = 0.24, &#8499; = 0.23). On the other hand, the opposite results were shown, regarding the lower body - thigh and calf. Female participants had more injuries on both their thighs and their calves (each, &#8499; = 0.15, &#8499; = 0.06). As for the satisfaction level, both genders showed similar results. 2) The satisfaction level and injury causes, according to the subjects? exercising experience: The analysis done with ANOVA demonstrated that some injuries on both the upper and lower body were resulted differently, depending on how long they had exercised for, in the past. The participants who had more than two years of exercising experience, turned out to have the most injuries on their shoulders, among the upper parts of their bodies. Among the lower parts of their bodies, those who had exercised for more than two years had the most injuries on their ankles. Furthermore, the subjects? satisfaction level depending on their exercising experience, showed significant differences among social satisfaction, leisurely satisfaction, and physical satisfaction. 3) The satisfaction level and injury causes, according to the subjects? purpose of exercising: Another analysis that was done with the assistance of ANOVA - differential injuries on the upper and lower body parts, depending on the subjects? exercising purpose - revealed the following results. Among the upper body, the most injuries were found on the participants? shoulders and wrists (each, &#8499; = 0.31, &#8499; = 0.22) that had resulted from exercises done for muscle increase. However, no statistically significant results were drawn from the purpose analysis, for the lower body, or for the satisfaction level with exercising. 4) The satisfaction level and injury causes, according to the subjects? exercising method: First of all, the analysis based on the duration of exercising indicated that, those who exercise for more than an hour and a half had the most injuries on their lower legs. No statistically significant results were found, regarding the participants? satisfaction level and their time of exercising. Secondly, the analysis based on the frequency of exercising, demonstrated that those who exercise six or seven days a week, become injured the most on their lower legs. The frequency of exercising also showed some statistically significant results on the participants? satisfaction level, regarding social satisfaction, leisurely satisfaction, and physical satisfaction. Thirdly, the analysis based on the repetition of each set of their exercise, turned out to be statistically insignificant, regarding the injuries. However, considerable results were shown, in terms of the satisfaction levels - psychological, leisurely, and physical. Finally, the analysis based on the break time between the sets did not show statistically significant results in neither the injuries nor the satisfaction levels of the participants. 5) The satisfaction level and injury causes, according to the subjects? involvement in PT: The following results were drawn from the employment of t-test, in order to find out if the injuries were affected by whether or not the subjects were involved in PT. The results were statistically significant, regarding the fact that the participants who were not involved in PT had more injuries on both their upper and lower bodies, than those who were in fact, involved. Among the upper body, those who were uninvolved in PT had more injuries on the neck and shoulder area (each, &#8499; = 0.10, &#8499; = 0.23) than the involved ones (each, &#8499; = 0.02, &#8499; = 0.08). Similarly for the lower body, those uninvolved in PT were injured more on their knees (&#8499; = 0.18) than those involved in PT (&#8499; = 0.07); the difference is statistically significant (p < 0.05). The relationship between the participants? satisfaction level and their involvement in PT turned out to show the following results from the analysis done by t-test. Those involved in PT showed more satisfaction than those uninvolved, in all six categories of satisfaction - psychological, educational, social, leisure, physical, and environmental - which is indeed, statistically significant.

more